You see people talking about Pisces having “two personalities” all the time, right? They call them flaky, two-faced, or just totally unreliable. I got tired of hearing it, so I decided to really dig into this complexity—or what I call, the astrological mess—to figure out what the heck is actually going on when you deal with someone born under the two fishes.
The Observation: It’s Not Two, It’s Too Many
I started by tossing out the easy explanation. It’s not just one personality switching to a second one. That’s Gemini. With Pisces, what I discovered while charting things out is that they don’t switch; they just hold everything simultaneously. It’s like they grabbed all the traits from the eleven signs before them and stuffed them into one poor, mutable water shell.
My initial practice involved reading up on their ruling planets. Most signs have one, maybe two. Pisces? They’re co-ruled. You’ve got Jupiter, the old ruler, which is all about expansion, luck, and big, philosophical ideas. Then you’ve got Neptune, the modern ruler, which is about illusion, dreams, fog, and dissolving boundaries. Trying to reconcile those two giant forces in one person is like trying to make fire and water cooperate. It doesn’t work—it just makes steam and confusion.
- I categorized the common complaints I heard about Pisces behavior.
- I tracked the duality: sometimes totally spiritual and compassionate, sometimes totally lost and deceptive.
- I understood the finality: the last sign, wrapping up the zodiac’s journey. No wonder they’re exhausted and want to escape.
My real research began when I tried to pin down a particular Pisces. This wasn’t some abstract, “I wonder about the cosmos” project. It was personal. I was driven to the brink by my ex-colleague, let’s call him Leo. Every time I thought I understood his position on a project, he would completely flip it the next day. It wasn’t malice, I realized; it was chaos.

The Catalyst: The Corporate Lunacy
The whole exercise kicked off last spring after a particularly nasty meeting where Leo completely threw my department under the bus to save his own skin. He sat there with this blank, innocent stare, detailing how my team had messed up the final delivery date. The day before, he had sent me an email confirming my exact timeline was perfectly fine. He was always doing this—a constant back-and-forth that left me feeling like I was the insane one.
I spent the evening drinking coffee and pulling up his birth chart (yes, I went that deep). I plotted the exact degrees of his Sun, Moon, and Mercury. I cross-referenced his chart with a classical text I found—something super dense that talked about the “dissolving influence of the Fishes.” I refused to believe I was dealing with a simple liar; I was convinced I was dealing with a systemic flaw in his personal operating system.
The practice shifted from academic research to emotional survival. I documented every single inconsistency Leo displayed. I created a spreadsheet where I logged the date, the contradictory statement, and the effect it had on the team. I wanted to find the pattern, the mathematical reason why someone could genuinely believe two opposite things within eight hours.
What I pieced together was that Leo wasn’t trying to trick me. He just genuinely adopted the reality of the person he was speaking to at that moment. When he was talking to the boss, he was the person who believed my department was slow. When he was talking to me, he was the person who believed I was doing a great job.
This whole toxic back-and-forth came to a head when he tried his ultimate maneuver. After months of this madness, right after I finally walked into the HR office and resigned, convinced I couldn’t deal with the brain damage anymore, he called me.
“Hey, buddy, listen,” he said. “I fought the VP on your behalf. They wanted to fire you, but I convinced them to make you lead on this new project. The VP loves you now. Don’t quit. They need you.”
I literally felt the gears crunch in my head. The person who systematically sabotaged me was now my biggest cheerleader? This entire project, this whole blog post, it crystallized right there. He wasn’t two people; he was maybe four or five people, and he was completely unaware of the collision damage.
The Realization: The Complexity Isn’t Dual, It’s Dissolving
I stuck to my resignation, of course. I blocked his number shortly after, but not before I finally processed the meaning of the two fish swimming in opposite directions. It’s not “one good fish, one bad fish.” It’s both fish swimming away from each other and away from the present moment.
This intense personal trial drove me to this conclusion: Pisces people aren’t malicious, they’re just highly porous. They absorb the energy and expectations of whoever is nearest. The “two personalities” you see are just the different people they encountered that morning. They’re a mutable sign and a water sign—they’re shapeless and they move. You can’t get mad at them for being shapeless; you just have to know how to deal with the flood.
And you know the real kicker that proves my whole practice was right? That “lead on the new project” role Leo offered me out of the blue? I looked it up online a few weeks ago. They couldn’t fill it. It was still sitting on the job board. The description had been edited three times. It’s a testament to the fact that whatever Leo pitches or promises, it ultimately dissolves into the cosmic ether, just like their ruling planet, Neptune, promises.
So, yeah, I went through the ringer, but I got the definitive answer: It’s not a split; it’s a cosmic sponge that needs wringing out.
