Well, I started this exploration about what justice as outcome is like a kid on a new adventure. First off, I decided to dig into what the experts have to say. I hit up a bunch of online resources, you know, those articles and videos where experts spill the beans.
I was like a detective, sifting through all that info. I jotted down the key points they mentioned. One expert said that for justice as outcome, fairness in distribution is super important. That got me thinking, how do we really measure fairness?
So, I went ahead and started looking at real – world examples. I checked out some court cases where the outcome was supposed to be just. I watched how the judges made their decisions, what evidence they considered. It was like watching a really intense game, but with a lot more at stake.
I also talked to some folks on the street. I asked them what they thought justice as outcome meant to them. Some said it was about getting what you deserve, while others thought it was more about making things right for everyone involved.
As I was gathering all this info, I realized it wasn’t as simple as I thought. There were so many different factors to consider. For example, in some cases, the law might say one thing, but public opinion thought another.
After all this research, I sat down and tried to piece it all together. I made a list of what I thought were the key elements of justice as outcome. I found that it’s a mix of fairness, equality, and making sure that the punishment or reward fits the situation.
Finally, I put all my findings into a little report. I shared it with some of my friends, and we had a good old debate about it. Some agreed with me, and some had their own ideas. That’s when I knew I had really dived into this topic and learned a whole lot about what justice as outcome really is!
