Man, reading the I Ching is supposed to be this deep, wise thing, right? But when I first tried to tackle all 64 hexagrams, I hit a wall. It wasn’t just confusing; it was like wading through ancient philosophical mud. Every time I tried to read the classic translations, my eyes glazed over by Hexagram 12. I needed a system that wasn’t just theory—I needed a practical roadmap, something you could actually use when your life felt like a dumpster fire.
For years, I treated the I Ching like a novelty—something I pulled out when I was bored. But things changed a couple of years back. I was in a really rough spot, living paycheck to paycheck, sharing a cramped, humid apartment with three other dudes who didn’t understand the concept of washing dishes. My job was miserable, and I felt trapped in a cyclical pattern of bad decisions. I needed a genuine way to chart complexity, and I decided to stop messing around and actually internalize the whole damn thing.
The Great Internalization Attempt: Why 1-to-64 is Garbage
My first attempt was the obvious one: Start at Hexagram 1 (The Creative) and plow straight through to Hexagram 64 (Before Completion). I failed miserably. Why? Because the sequential numbering is arbitrary in terms of thematic learning. It’s like trying to learn anatomy by reading a dictionary. You memorize the words, but you don’t grasp the functional flow.
I realized I needed to stop focusing on the number and start focusing on the structure—the architecture the ancients used to build this thing. That’s when I started hunting for the “expert” method. I didn’t find it in some shiny new book; I found it buried in an old, ragged commentary written by a guy who taught Chinese literature back in the 70s.

His core idea was simple, but it shifted everything: You don’t read 64 hexagrams; you read 32 pairs.
Deconstructing the Structure: My 3-Step Practical Process
I set out to systematically document the process over four brutal months. I bought index cards, taped diagrams all over my pathetic little corner of the apartment, and committed two hours every morning before work to this practice. It was intense, mostly because I had convinced myself that my personal survival depended on mastering this system.
Here is exactly how I started breaking down the 64:
Step 1: Identify the Pairs and Their Opposites
I started by recognizing that most hexagrams (except for eight specific ones like 1, 2, 27, 28, 61, 62, 63, 64, which are symmetrical) are structurally related to their opposite. If you flip the lines of Hexagram A upside down, you often get Hexagram B, and B is usually the direct thematic counterpart of A. They define each other.
- I stopped trying to memorize Hexagram 3 (Difficulty at the Beginning) alone.
- Instead, I immediately paired it with Hexagram 4 (Youthful Folly), which is its structural inversion.
- The practice became: “If you have difficulty starting (3), what state does that lead to if ignored? Folly (4).”
This cut the memorization load in half instantly. I physically wrote the two interpretations next to each other, forcing my brain to understand them as two sides of the same coin: growth and stagnation, light and shadow.
Step 2: Focus on the Narrative Arc (The Upper and Lower Trigrams)
The expert commentary I found insisted that you cannot read the hexagram without understanding the story told by the lower trigram (the initial condition, how you act) and the upper trigram (the external environment, the outcome).
I committed to this deep dive:
- I spent one week just drawing and feeling the eight basic trigrams (Heaven, Earth, Fire, Water, etc.). I didn’t read anything else. I would visualize Heaven (three solid lines) as pure forward momentum and Earth (three broken lines) as pure receptivity.
- When I read Hexagram 11 (Peace), I broke it down: Earth (receptivity) is below, Heaven (momentum) is above. This means the powerful force moves downward to meet the yielding force. That is true peace and integration.
- Then I flipped it: Hexagram 12 (Stagnation). Heaven (momentum) is below, Earth (receptivity) is above. The vital energy moves upward and away from the receptive earth—blockage!
By focusing on the interaction of these two “mini-stories,” the hexagrams stopped being static images and started becoming verbs—active processes.
Step 3: Integrating the Nuclear Trigrams
This is where things got really dense, but also provided the “guts” of the hexagram. The nuclear trigrams are the four middle lines (lines 2, 3, 4, 5) which form two hidden trigrams that reveal the inner, secret dynamics of the situation.
I used the cards I made in Step 1 and Step 2, and then drew the two nuclear trigrams in a different colored ink. I started asking: “What is the surface message, and what is the underlying engine?”
For example, in Hexagram 6 (Conflict), the surface is Water (below) meeting Heaven (above). Water flows down, Heaven ascends. They diverge, they fight. That’s the outside picture.
But the nuclear trigrams are often Fire and Abyss—meaning internally, the situation is characterized by hidden intensity and danger. This realization provided a much fuller picture. It means the conflict isn’t just an external fight; the true danger lies in the emotional intensity (Fire) and the trap (Abyss) that you can fall into if you don’t handle the conflict correctly.
The Result: Understanding Cycles and Escaping the Rut
After following this paired, architectural approach, I wasn’t just reciting 64 hexagrams; I had internalized the entire flow of change—the universal cycles of human experience.
The reason I went so hard on this practice? Because my life was a hot mess, and I desperately needed to see patterns. When I was going through that horrible living situation and that dead-end job, I was so focused on the immediate crisis that I couldn’t see the larger cycle I was stuck in.
Funny enough, I ended up consulting the I Ching about the job, and I threw Hexagram 50 (The Cauldron). The main takeaway is that you have the vessel, you have the fire, now you need to use the energy to cook and nourish the community. I realized I was just holding the vessel, not cooking anything useful.
It sounds dramatic, but realizing that allowed me to quit that job entirely—with zero backup plan—and start pursuing the work I actually wanted to do. I didn’t wait for things to fix themselves; I understood my internal process (the lower trigram) needed to shift to influence the external outcome (the upper trigram).
If you feel overwhelmed by the 64, ditch the linear read. Embrace the pairs, understand the trigram story, and then peek at the inner dynamics. That is the only practical way I found to truly operationalize this massive book of wisdom.
